Select Page
Kalimba: The Spirit of Earth Wind and Fire

Kalimba: The Spirit of Earth Wind and Fire

Outstanding!! Thank you, Asian Journal!! We felt a love of country, community, and harmony in music, which is what an outstanding group sounds like. The acoustics of the venue were wonderfully vibrant. I am glad it got engineered right!

Immigrants are pieces of American history

Once you know the truth, you can’t ever go back and pick up your suitcase of lies. Heavier or not, the truth is yours now.

Sue Monk Kidd


Desirree Delacruz shared this: “I am a millennial American citizen who was born in Westminster, CA whose father, Cesar hailed from Bulacan province. He is the second of eleven siblings who migrated by first becoming a seaman and who now works at USPS. He is credited with helping seven of his siblings migrate. I can only imagine what my dad had to endure: depression, loneliness and in those tears, he had to be so strong to have a vision, larger than his situation then. He met my mother, Imelda who worked alongside my dad at a technology company until she was laid off. For six years, she cared for Juanita Lopez, my grandmother, who had a stroke. I believe if I had to face what they went through, to live lives for others, I would not have the emotional and psychological capacity to transcend their struggles and sufferings. Why? Because everything was given to me. I did not experience those difficulties and I would not know how to respond. Immigrants are a piece of history. They are pieces of American history that built our ancestry, that built our family, that built everything.”

First, Desirree’s smile was my red carpet welcome. Before the ritual of facials started, she held both of my hands, and we both got still, in meditation. As we held hands, I sobbed uncontrollably inside O Skin Care in Cerritos.

 After meditating, she asked what happened. I cried and could not help but think about the pain and suffering of toddlers in diapers, imagining what they went through when U.S. border agents tear gassed them. This act was supposedly done according to Pres. Trump on behalf of our national security interests. As Americans, we were not consulted nor did we agree to these despicable acts of cruelty propagated by heartless, yet professionally trained federal agents.

 I cried imagining the irritants that caused burning to these toddlers’ eyes, mucous membranes, throat, lungs and skin. Kim Kyung Hoon snapped a moving image that was published in the Washington Post. It catalyzed a discussion about who came to America’s shores and who were allowed in.

 From persecution to a Philippine welcome

Did you know that in 1939, SS St Louis, a luxury cruise liner, had more than 900 Jews who fled Germany? They first traveled to Cuba and then hoped to get to the U.S. but were turned away in Havana.

 “Cuba was seen as a temporary transit point to get to America and officials at the Cuban embassy in Berlin were offering visas for about $200 or $300 each – $3,000 to $5,000 (£1,800 to £3,000) at today’s prices,” Mike Lanchin of BBC World Service wrote.

They sought entry to Canada, Uruguay, Paraguay and Argentina but they were also turned down.

 Forced to return to Europe, more than 250 Jews went back to Germany, only to meet their deaths in the gas chambers.

Six countries turned down these 900 Jews.

 In the meantime,  Philippines welcomed 1,200 Jews who fled Germany’s holocaust. One of those Jews was Herbert Zipper who was invited to conduct Manila Symphony Orchestra and today, in Colburn School of Music in downtown Los Angeles, there is a hall named after Zipper, then a Manila-based conductor.

The return of 250 Jews to Germany where they met their death in the gas chambers collectively moved countries in Europe, Great Britain and the U.S. who were all part of the United Nations to agree to a humanitarian concept, called asylum. It was premised on allowing migrants fleeing their countries because of persecution, war, or the inability of their governments to stop persecution but only after they make credible claims, when they apply, and then, they are allowed entry and integration into the country they are seeking asylum from.

Germany now recognizes that right to seek refuge or asylum in their constitution, while France enacted more stringent asylum laws that upon six months of residence, the application must be filed instead of nine months. But what about the United States?

 The Daily Podcast of the New York Times on Nov. 21 reported 700,000 pending asylum cases in the U.S. So why would Pres. Trump send over 5,000 military troops when he could have sent analysts, lawyers that would have reduced the backlog?

 Instead, Trump introduced metering where only 30 asylum applicants can apply daily. Crowds that are in the thousands have resorted to arbitrary encampments at the border, essentially waiting for their turn to apply for asylum and that waiting can be for months, if not years, as only 30 are allowed to apply each day. 

These mothers were fleeing persecution at the hands of gang members, facing the certainty of deaths if they do not comply so they have opted to protect their children and are simply seeking safety and a new future.

 Silence and anger are residues of fear 

Recall how 100,000 Vietnamese were allowed as refugees in America? They were assigned to various countries first, in Thailand and in the Philippines and for years, they awaited their turn to enter the U.S. and then, allowed resettlement with American families who help them integrate into the U.S. cities like Boston, Westminster, and even Las Vegas.

 But do you recall Haitian refugees fleeing the Duvalier’s dictatorship? Pres. Bush and Pres. Clinton classified them as economic refugees, and that constructive definition became their destiny – back to Haiti as they were refused entry into the U.S.

 What will the state of asylum be now? Where it has been strategic and political, the message to the world by Trump is – “go home, we could not be bothered, and if you are persistent, your children will be harmed.” 

Trump is isolating America, America first is his cry, all resources to America first.

 Will we allow the likes of Albert Einstein, a refugee? Or Mikhail Baryshnikov, a famous Russian dancer who sought refuge in America? Will America go back to its best practice of resettling refugees, as in the resettlement of the Vietnamese?

 Or will America follow the example of Philippine President Manuel Quezon who welcomed Jewish refugees and who stayed in the Philippines from 1937 to 1941? CNN reported: “The Philippines’ first president, Manuel Quezon, and U.S. High Commissioner to the Philippines, Paul McNutt, devised a strategy to grant visas to European Jews, who were fleeing the Holocaust.

“That was like a rebirth,” said Noel Izon, the filmmaker of the documentary, “An Open Door: Jewish Rescue in the Philippines,” in which he interviewed several Jewish refugees. “They went from certain death to this life.”

 CNN’s Madison Park reported on Feb. 3, 2015: “Among them was Frank Ephraim, who arrived in Manila at the age of eight. He recounted his experience in his biography, ‘Escape to Manila: From Nazi Tyranny to Japanese Terror.’

“’My father got a lot of positive attention, coming from a place where Jews were exiled and treated so poorly,’ said his daughter, of his escape from Europe. Frank Ephraim died in 2006. ‘The Filipinos were incredibly kind and treated him extremely well. There was an element of something so redemptive.’” 

We now know the merit of allowing a refugee in, like Albert Einstein, the scientist, or even a ballet dancer like Mikhail Baryshnikov. Why are we then viewing these caravans of migrants as a migration of criminals when we can simply, through a federal government agency, process the 700,000 asylum seekers and lift the metering to a more reasonable amount of applications to be seen daily?

Published on Asian Journal

Are there leaders with integrity left in America? (Part II of women can change America series)

This ‘one nation, indivisible’ is deeply divided along political, economic, racial and religious lines. And despite our historic dream of being “a light unto the nations,” the gaps between us and our global neighbors continue to grow more deadly. The conflicts and contradictions of twenty–first century life are breaking the American heart and threatening to compromise our democratic values.

Parker Palmer

The human heart is the first home of democracy. It is where we embrace our questions. Can we be equitable? Can we be generous? Can we listen with our whole beings, not just our minds, and offer our attention rather than our opinions? And do we have enough resolve in our hearts to act courageously, relentlessly, without giving up—ever—trusting our fellow citizens to join with us in our determined pursuit of a living democracy?

Terry Tempest Williams, “Engagement,” as quoted by Parker J. Palmer, “Healing the Heart of Democracy: The Courage to Create a Politics Worthy of the Human Spirit.”

You have the 45th U.S. President Donald Trump at rallies injecting himself in the midterms elections and says to his base: “These two maniacs stopped our momentum.” 

Yet, he failed to inform his base that one of these maniacs, Robert Bowers, is now accused of killing 11 folks in a Jewish synagogue in Pittsburgh, while another maniac he refers to is Cesar Sayoc, a Filipino-Italian who sent 15 pipe bombs to the leaders of the Democratic Party. These were attempted assassinations of two past U.S. presidents, a former secretary of state, a former vice president and more.

While these unhinged presidential actions are occurring during the midterm elections, actions unprecedented in America and known to be prevalent in developing countries, we know something is so wrong about America.

We know something is unhinged when the most powerful man in the world acts beneath his presidential position and foments hatred at the rallies by calling the press the “enemy of the people,” the only profession whose practice of freedom of expression is enshrined in the U.S. Constitution, you wonder why he keeps doing it?

In Pittsburgh, he insisted on visiting the city in spite of the request of the mayor and local officials not to, as resources will be diverted for his protection. Instead, the president still came with the First Lady and local officials shunned him while thousands protested his presence, held a block away from the synagogue.

We wonder why all folks of color are labeled rapists and murderers and now a caravan of refugees from Central America are being labeled as harboring gangs and Middle Easterns by this U.S. president when in fact these are families fleeing violence? 

The Pittsburgh massacre suspect said that he had to do it because America is being invaded by these diseased migrants that will lead to the dilution of the white race and he needed to act to stop this compelling emergency by going to the Pittsburgh synagogue and fired upon these Jewish synagogue worshippers.

What has happened to America’s democracy? Can its heart be healed? Can women coming of age give us examples of how to be decent Americans and how to move forward with truth?

Can the U.S. Supreme Court’s past decision about press freedom enlighten us today that this current president’s media reference as “the enemy of the people” is unconstitutional and wrong?

Women coming of age 

I watched the 2017 film, “The Post,” could not quite adjust my feelings towards how indecisive Katharine Graham, the former owner and publisher of The Washington Post, was portrayed. 

She was meticulously adept in asking questions of her inner circle, but somehow clueless in recognizing she has the authority to make the final decision. She was depicted as ambivalent and conflict-evasive, which she admits in her personal memoirs. 

That was until portions of the Pentagon Papers were delivered to the Washington Post’s assignment editor and thousands of pages were given by Daniel Ellsberg. 

That marked her turning point, a qualitative leap for the common good, what I call one of her moral cornerstones marked by uplifting and exposing the truth!

She made a crucial strategic decision, of publishing the Pentagon Papers, which catapulted the Washington Post into a credible source of news, facts, evidence and true to its mission as a newspaper. The Washington Post became a key resource for national news. 

Russ Wiggins wrote a personal note to the staff: “Philip L. Graham has left in our daily care and custody an honest and a conscientious newspaper which I know that all of you are eager to maintain as a daily memorial to his own genius and integrity. And now we must take up the duties he laid upon us, with a heavy heart, but nonetheless with a high hope that we may succeed in doing what he would have us do.”

I just finished reading Katharine’s Pulitzer Prize-winning memoirs and how she evolved from being supportive of Pres. Lyndon B. Johnson’s actions in Vietnam and later, developed her personal opposition towards the war, given her eldest son’s personal letters to her, while deployed as a soldier in Vietnam.

He wrote about the senseless violence towards an ill-defined cause and for which did not quite advance the national security interests of the United States.

The Post continued to report on the Vietnam War, and the 500,000 U.S. soldiers deployed there. It then grew its editorial department in 1966-1969, when Post added 50 positions and its budget grew from $2.25 million to $7 million in 1969.

Katharine is depicted in the film, “The Post,” as nervously taking a stand to publish the Pentagon Papers and closely monitoring the backlash while at the same time, she experienced the solidarity of the newspapers around the U.S., who followed The Washington Post’s lead to publish the “verboten” Pentagon Papers.

Katharine rationalized her decision in keeping with the newspaper’s mission and putting the nation’s interests before the papers.

It piqued my curiosity to keep reading about Katharine and her resolve, her convictions, and even her own stance, amidst being surrounded, influenced, criticized meanly, and strongly pressured by strong men around her, including Pres. Johnson.

The impact of a woman’s decision: The Washington Post and New York Times’ US Supreme Court decision

It is a life that she allowed other folks to guide her, but also her inner convictions to stand by her decisions. 

For example, it took tremendous courage for her to set a precedent of publishing the Pentagon Papers, then, joined in a lawsuit with the New York Times, and then, to wait nervously for the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision, 6-3. The decision, written by Justice Black, excerpted here in part:

“In the First Amendment, the Founding Fathers gave the free press the protection it must have to fulfill its essential role in our democracy. The press was to serve the governed, not the governors. The Government’s power to censor the press was abolished so that the press would remain forever free to censure the Government. The press was protected so that it could bare the secrets of government and inform the people. Only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government.

“And paramount among the responsibilities of a free press is the duty to prevent any part of the government from deceiving the people and sending them off to distant lands to die of foreign fevers and foreign shot and shell. In my view, far from deserving condemnation for their courageous reporting, the New York Times, the Washington Post, and other newspapers should be commended for serving the purpose that the Founding Fathers saw so clearly. In revealing the workings of government that led to the Vietnam war, the newspapers nobly did precisely that which the Founders hoped and trusted they would do.

“The Government’s case here is based on premises entirely different from those that guided the Framers of the First Amendment. The Solicitor General has carefully and emphatically stated: 

“Now, Mr. Justice [BLACK], your construction of . . . [the First Amendment] is well known, and I certainly respect it. You say that no law means no law, and that should be obvious. I can only [p718] say, Mr. Justice, that to me it is equally obvious that “no law” does not mean “no law,” and I would seek to persuade the Court that that is true. . . . [T]here are other parts of the Constitution that grant powers and responsibilities to the Executive, and . . . the First Amendment was not intended to make it impossible for the Executive to function or to protect the security of the United States.

“And the Government argues in its brief that, in spite of the First Amendment,[t]he authority of the Executive Department to protect the nation against publication of information whose disclosure would endanger the national security stems from two interrelated sources: the constitutional power of the President over the conduct of foreign affairs and his authority as Commander-in-Chief.

“In other words, we are asked to hold that, despite the First Amendment’s emphatic command, the Executive Branch, the Congress, and the Judiciary can make laws enjoining publication of current news and abridging freedom of the press in the name of “national security.” The Government does not even attempt to rely on any act of Congress. Instead, it makes the bold and dangerously far-reaching contention that the courts should take it upon themselves to “make” a law abridging freedom of the press in the name of equity, presidential power and national security, even when the representatives of the people in Congress have adhered to the command of the First Amendment and refused to make such a law.

“To find that the president has ‘inherent power’ to halt the publication of news by resort to the courts would wipe out the First Amendment and destroy the fundamental liberty and security of the very people the Government hopes to make ‘secure.’

“No one can read the history of the adoption of the First Amendment without being convinced beyond any doubt that it was injunctions like those sought here that Madison and his collaborators intended to outlaw in this Nation for all time.

“The word ‘security’ is a broad, vague generality whose contours should not be invoked to abrogate the fundamental law embodied in the First Amendment. The guarding of military and diplomatic secrets at the expense of informed representative government provides no real security for our Republic. The Framers of the First Amendment, fully aware of both the need to defend a new nation and the abuses of the English and Colonial governments, sought to give this new society strength and security by providing that freedom of speech, press, religion, and assembly should not be abridged. This thought was eloquently expressed in 1937 by Mr. Chief Justice Hughes—great man and great Chief Justice that he was—when the Court held a man could not be punished for attending a meeting run by Communists.”

“The greater the importance of safeguarding the community from incitements to the overthrow of our institutions by force and violence, the more imperative is the need to preserve inviolate the constitutional rights of free speech, free press and free assembly in order to maintain the opportunity for free political discussion, to the end that government may be responsive to the will of the people and that changes, if desired, may be obtained by peaceful means. Therein lies the security of the Republic, the very foundation of constitutional government.”

Would you, as sworn U.S. citizens make your voices known to our elected leaders that you want the truth, and nothing but the truth and that means uncensored news publications, and the responsible use of power at any levels (executive, legislative, judicial)?

Or would you blindly protect your perceived economic station in life and by indifference enable more lies to be told?

How would you act as guardians of American democracy? Would you pursue integrity as one of America’s foremost values by insisting on the truth?

Katharine Graham was not trained to be a CEO nor trained to be a publisher. She watched from the sidelines and did not have an opportunity to hold a full-time job until her husband died.

Yet she made the most visible, credibility-sustaining decisions for her newspaper, The Washington Post, displaying her personal courage, “the scope of her wisdom and power of compassion,” love for this country’s democratic freedoms.  

From that national exposé, it initiated a national debate to purge our nation from its involvement in an unjust war in Vietnam, which to the end, had 58,220 U.S. military fatal casualties, between 200,000 to 250,000 South Vietnamese soldiers dead and 1.1 million North Vietnamese and Viet Cong casualties. By far, the most casualties were incurred in World War II, battle deaths and civilians of all countries to have been 56.4 million. (Source: Britannica.com)

In examining your own lives, have you faced choices where you placed truth above lies, love of country first over your pocketbook, harmony over personal grudges and deep anger? 

What legacy are we building by our personal actions for our children and grandchildren? 

To this day, Katharine Graham’s personal decision of courage and commitment to the mission of truthful news information are inspiring.

If enough women of conviction and those coming into positions of power are leaders promoting truth, justice and fairness wherever they are, I dare say many more can follow their examples of integrity to create a new America where integrity is the currency of our national politics, culture and discussion.

Integrity allows the human heart to flourish which enriches any democracy. It is time to curse the darkness by telling the truth and becoming moral leaders of integrity in America.

Published on Asian Journal

How women can change America

You can’t be what you can’t see.

Marian Wright Edelman

“If they see it, they can be it

Geena Davis, March 19, 2015 at Mount St. Mary’s University.

To every woman who gave birth, to every taxpayer and citizen of this nation, we have fought for everybody else’s equal rights. It’s our time to have wage equality once and for all, and equal rights for women in the United States of America.

Patricia Arquette, acceptance speech for the Oscar for Best Supporting Actress (2015). 

All three women converged in aspirations that the time has come for women to lead. For far too long, we have been relegated to the background, in support of, and behind men in many organizations.

The time is now for women to be in parity with men. For far too long we have toiled and worked hard, and contributed to growing businesses, non-profits, foundations, and even government institutions, including tending to a home and children, while for every dollar that the man gets paid, a fraction of 84 cents goes to a woman.

The Report on the Status of Women and Girls, unveiled before a crowd of 1,000 at Skirball Museum, valued lost wages and unrealized gains at $450 billion.

Close to half a trillion dollars that women are not paid, even as they work hard and perform, in the workplace. 

The Los Angeles Times’ Feb. 22, 2015 business front page headlined “Not a woman’s place: Many are leaving tech, citing a hostile environment.” 

It is a world where women are made to prove themselves over and over again, “The continuous pattern of all these people treating me like I didn’t know what was going on, or excluding me from conversations and not trusting my assertions, all these things added up and it felt like there was an undercurrent of sexism,“ according to Tracy Chou, 27, a Pinterest engineer.

It is a world where Code.org claims that computing jobs will more than double to 1.2 million in 2020.  So in the high tech world of Facebook, Instagram, Yahoo, Google, Snapchat, Pinterest and more, the LA Times reports that men outnumber women by 4 to 1. 

What can be done towards gender parity and women empowerment?

In California, the state legislature has the fewest number of women since 1998 and ranks 17th in women’s representations in state legislatures (The Report on Status of Women and Girls by Mount St. Mary’s University, March 19, 2015).

In the 2014 election, the report found that women won 5 out of 20 Senate and 19 out of 80 Assembly races.

In California’s 58 counties, women represent just about 255 of all county board supervisors and 28 percent of the all city council seats in the state’s 482 cities. 

When I worked at a state public health agency, I was the only female of color out of three regional administrators, two of whom were white males. That was in 1992.

 Since Mayor Eric Garcetti was elected to serve LA in 2013, 54 percent of his appointees to boards and commissions have been women. That mayoral action transformed gender inequality into making LA a model city where gender parity exists in executive positions.

 No longer the media-profiled city of gangbangers and drive-by shootings, Los Angeles City is coming into a healthy bloom, symbolized by the revitalized Echo Park, where lotuses are again alive and will be blooming in the summer.

We just wish that bloom and new life is reflected in all areas of the city, not so much in new buildings, but in neighborhoods with less trash, more parks, and better-paved sidewalks and streets.

LA’s First Lady, Amy Elaine Wakeland, reported that 3 out of 4 deputies to the mayor are women, and that of the 12 department general managers, six are women. The first lady asserts that if inequality of women’s status is not being monitored, then the problem of women’s inequality is not being addressed.

Yet, she is the first to admit that the two critical and significant departments, fire and police, have yet to address gender parity in their hiring practices.

Perhaps that lack of gender parity is also contributing to the surge of $18 million in settlements, from lawsuits filed by LAPD officers against the department.

The LA Times reported that from 2005 to 2010, officers sued the department more than 250 times over workplace issues, exposing crude behavior and retaliatory mindsets of supervisors.

Just recently, the LA Times reported a captain being retired from his position when sexual harassment allegations came up during his watch. When I read that he was allowed to retire on a five-figure pension, one must ask — was he rewarded with early retirement for his rogue, demeaning behaviors? No wonder men keep doing it, because they lose nothing of value.

To change that culture in the LAPD will require a mindset change where officers at the top are trained to provide good leadership practices, contributing to a professional workplace culture and a consciousness of sexual harassment prevention.

Back to the film industry: Two easy ways to address sexism in the film industry, according to Geena Davis, is first, when crowds are cast, 50 percent go to women and before casting is done for the actors, consider half of the roles written to be for women and change the character names to that of women.

By doing so, you will find women doing non-traditional roles in film and television and we can start seeing women in positions of visibility, echoing what she said, “If they see it, they can be it.”

Recall the television program where Geena Davis played Commander-in-Chief Mackenzie Allen, created by Rod Lurie? That show ranked #1 in ratings in 2005, until its contender, “American Idol” outranked it. Had the network, ABC, supported it beyond its first season of 18 episodes, who knows how far we would have been prepared to watch and to visualize a woman president in the White House?

 Consider for example CBS’ “Madam Secretary” and we now expect foreign policy decisions can be done by a woman and more so, we can expect her to qualify as a future president.

Have you seen Netflix’s “The Bodyguard” where the secretary of state is cast as a woman, though still portrayed as a devious, manipulative, ambitious one until she is assassinated? Not a good scenario for a woman in a high position of power — to be a victim of a murderous coup by males who conspire to have her position — good thing that is fiction!

Davis spoke of how in the 129 top-grossing films in 2006 -2011, the ratio of females to males is 2:5. 

“California is one of the largest producers of film,” according to the report, yet women in the film industry occupy fewer than 20 percent of the critical behind-the-scenes occupations, serving primarily as producers.

Moving forward to gender parity and empowerment

In California, 61 percent of the female population are women of color: Latinos, Asians, African Americans, who can determine the outcome of its elections, if all of these women of color voted.

In 2018, I am optimistic as I see women candidates running in every level of public position, which we hope after the midterm elections in November would create a tsunami of potential substantive change for America.

“Latinas make up the state’s youngest and second-largest ethnic group under the age of 25,” according to “The Report on the Status of Women and Girls in California” in 2015.

Which means, elections upon elections, if Latina women under age 25 registered, voted and informed themselves to vote as a group, Latina women might determine the outcome of elections in California.

For the 2016 U.S. presidential election, the candidate who communicated her vision persuasively to these Latina women, and addressed their concerns towards reunification of their families through immigration reform, did not become the next White House resident.

Yet, even if the demographics changed to reflect more of these young Latinas, their voting rights have been restricted in 22 states.

American Prospect reported “of the 22 states with new restrictions, 18 passed them through Republican-controlled bodies. After Republicans took over state houses and governorships in 2010, voting restrictions typically followed party lines.”

But, hope is always alive. As young women are now earning 170,000 more bachelor’s degrees each year than men, according to the Millennial Legacy’s website, “today, women represent roughly half of the nation’s law and medical students and 55 percent of the nation’s professionals overall.”

Education will empower these women to design their own lives and to take charge of their communities and later, even leading their own city council districts and legislative assembly positions, Senate races, business establishments, foundations and non-profit leadership positions.

Carlos Bulosan wrote, “…history has determined our lives, and we must…work hard for what we believe to be the right thing…life is something we borrow and must give back richer when the time comes.”

In time, and hopefully in our lifetimes, we can witness not just gender parity in the city of LA’s executive part of the municipal government, but also in the LAPD, in the LAFD, and see that realized as well in California, in Washington, DC and throughout the U.S. 

If Iceland, Finland, Philippines, Belgium, Germany and United Kingdom have all been led by women presidents, we too can elect a woman to be U.S. president, a woman to lead us from the Oval Office and to be our Commander-in-Chief. 

As Amy Wakeland said, “Talent is universally distributed, but opportunities are not.” 

Published on Asian Journal

‘The Coming of Good Winds’: Their paintings and the guiding principles of Ronald Cortez, Danny Doce and Master Jessie Mariñas

We used to be able to manage with the belief that the physical art object was the end product of art, and the process of art was everything that went into achieving it. In this view, the artist, the visionary capacity, reaches into a realm less accessible to normal perception and, through acquired technique, translates vision into a finished work of art – the art object itself. As part of that process, the artist communicates inwardly at first. The art of creation is a learning process for the artist, as both vision and techniques are honed by the production of each art object. The process is one of considering, refining, learning – in an exchange with the self. As the ever-quotable Picasso said, ‘I am always doing that which I cannot do, in order that I may learn how to do it.’

Hugh Moss, “The Art of Understanding Art: A New Perspective” (2015).

We were also taught to navigate the seas around us by men of wisdom and talent, who had sailed far, to the lands in the north where there was ice in the mountains, to the south, and the far countries which were ruled by leaders with skins fairer than others. And then, there were the techniques of war to be learned as well, but I was never meant to be a warrior for I was meant, I suppose, to be a sailor, a navigator, having memorized as I did the landfall of different islands, different nations, the coming of the good winds, of the cruel seas, whipped by typhoons. I learned them all, for we have always been a nation of traders as well and the craft of the sailor is hammered into us as a matter of course, even before we learned how to sail.

F. Sionil Jose, “Viajero – A Filipino Novel,” (1998).

 Ronald Cortez was born in Lucban, Quezon when at two months old, he lost his father to an aneurysm to be singlehandedly raised by his mother, Nanie Ratio Cortez, who earned enough for rent, food and school fees, but no luxury like toys for Cortez.

 He possessed an innate interest for the arts and pencils and brown paper bags became his sketchpad where he would doodle away the “stored mountains in his imagination.” When his mom went overseas, he started drawing portraits at 10 years old.

 He watched commercial artists do charcoal drawings at shopping malls for inspiration and saved his allowance to buy art materials. In high school, his cousin asked Cortez to paint a portrait of his girlfriend. His cousin got him his first set of oil paints and it was then that he decided to be a painter. When he went to college at Southern Luzon Polytechnic, his mother persuaded him to be a viajero, a seaman. Yet, being a viajero was not his dream. He completed his seaman course to comply with his mother’s wishes.

 But, he satisfied his artistic hunger by browsing through books at the National Bookstore in Avenida.  At an art store in Mandaluyong, he then met his first mentor, Loreto Racuya, an artist who persuaded him to follow his dream. Racuya introduced him to the owner of an art supply store and shared insights about “the Parable of the Talents” which became Cortez’s guiding principles in life and his art. 

First: one must share his God-given talent with mankind. Second: that God would provide for what he needs to further his talents. Third: that each individual is endowed with their own set of talents but one can focus on a particular one and still be able to use other talents. Fourth: whatever we do should glorify God, who provides us with these talents. Fifth: we will be held accountable for our work.

Cortez’s paintings were introduced to me through a friend’s iPhone. They were lifelike, seemingly able to breathe on their own. In his paintings, fish appear to swim and glide, much like sailors who navigate the seas; tomatoes seem so ripe that you would want to slice them; a salted egg with a distinct-looking yolk and a hint of oil to it; and the Philippine peso is realistically portrayed.

“We overlook so many things because of our greediness. Masyado tayong fixated sa ibang bagay(We are too fixated on things). Lahat ng ito – paintings I credit to the One who gave me the talent and [it is] important for me to share my talent, to the Glory of God, even without my signature,” he said.

His exhibited paintings at the Viajeros: “The Farmer, Still Life, “Mag-ina,” “Helping Hands,” “Isda at Kamatis (series iv and v)” presented the daily realities of a farmworker. He intended their lives to be elevated, e.g., the ordinary “Tinapa 1 and 2,” masterfully rendered in pastel of bluish gray, white, red and brown, quite worthy of an art enthusiast’s attention, perhaps by someone like Hugh Moss whom I quoted above.

In contrast, he rendered four charcoal paintings: “Mag-ina” depicting a breastfeeding mother; “The Farmer” — showing a farmer and his carabao, “Helping Hands” — a grandmother and her granddaughter mending a dress with the child attempting to thread a needle, and “Isda at Kamatis” — a plate of fresh mackerel and tomatoes. These paintings created ‘dignity of labor’ impressions, illustrating the ordinary lives of farmers and low-income workers.

“Minsan, nasisipa lang (at times you just get kicked around),” yet his paintings captured the realism of subjects in action. Like the ripped upper arms of the farmworker, which matched the shield’s curvature, coming from two horns of the water buffalo or carabao that grow to join as one base.  One also notices the formation of the mother’s arms as she breastfed, coddling her baby and her long hair joining the curvature as if one sees the formation of a sling holding the baby safely.

“Pag nakatungo ka – marami kang makikitang simpleng bagay, pero pag nakatingala ka, parang iyong striving for greater things, greater expectations. I am not after that. One can see how greed creates chaos in the world, pero kung konti lang ang mayroon tayo, nakapagpasaya sa atin ay simpleng bagay lang. The world will be much happier and peaceful (If you look down, you get to notice simple things, but if you are looking up, it appears you are striving…but if you are content with what little you have, even the simplest things can bring you joy).” 

 Cortez joined 15 painters, whose works were displayed at the Philippine Consulate June 22 to July 6, 2018, as part of Bringing Filipino Art to the World’s initiative, to San Francisco, Manila, New York and Texas.  Close to a hundred folks attended their opening night, themed “Viajeros” (Voyagers). The participating artists included Emil Bauto, Xander Caceta, Raul Roco, Jr., Apolinario Follos, Maria Pureza Escano, Jane Ebarle, Ina Jardiolin, Coco Torre, Oying Madrilejos, Jesse Marinas, Danny Doce, Jun Impas, Jun Aquino, Orlando Distor, Ernesto Veroya and Ronald Cortez.

 The exhibit is a full circle moment for Cortez who considered being a seaman because of his mom’s persuasions, yet might it be that God had a different plan for him, to be a painter whose works are on exhibit at Viajeros?

 At New York’s Philippine Consulate, he joined 31 artists whose paintings were on display as part of the Society of Philippine – American Artists’ 25th-anniversary exhibit held Oct. 16 to 26, 2018.  His painting was called “Pamana.”

“Yes, Tita Prosy, that is our family portrait. I made it for my wife. I’m observing my son making drawings while my wife is watching. It is an oil painting on canvas, 24 x 18, “ he continued.

The ‘coming of the good winds’: Mentoring (a relationship of respect and caring)

“Natutulog ako kasama si Mama Mary (I sleep with Mama Mary). Everywhere I travel the statue is with me. This statue has been with me since I was 14 years old as [the] leader of the block rosary. I pray to her every night, siya lahat ang nagbibigay ng grasya kahit nasaan ako  (She is the source of grace wherever I go). My friends call me Milagrosa,“ Mariñas told me over a Facebook Messenger’s interview on October 15, 2018. Mariñas has now moved to the Philippines.

“Why Milagrosa?” 

Mariñas was born in the squatters area with four siblings. When he was little, he recalled being told by relatives that he would scratch his face until it got bloodied. But, while he slept, the wounds got healed, “Wala daw sugat ang mukha ko paggising ko. Nawawala. Kasi, kinakamot ko ang mukha ko hanggang magdugo (I woke up with no wounds on my face. They would banish, even though I would scratch my face until my face bled).

He got a degree in fine arts as a painting major from the University of Santo Tomas. Following the firing of his parents by Mr. Marcos, he immigrated to the U.S. in 1973, as the eldest of 12 siblings, intending to give them a fresh start in the U.S. He worked at Western Knapp Engineering Co., which specialized in plant designs and oil platforms, as the senior mechanics principal designer (the highest title given to a non-engineer) under an umbrella engineering group, Kvaerner, based in Norway. He worked for 35 years and qualified for disability retirement, following a spinal deterioration.

While recuperating from his spinal surgery in Manteca, he felt the energy, the “soul of a wall,” and told his wife, “I will soon have my mural there.” His wife doubted it would occur as he just had a spinal operation.

He resumed painting again at 58 years old and started with an abstract painting such that one might even see the image of Nativity, on closer look.

Nine years later, he is more prolific as a painter and has produced 40 paintings in a span of a decade.

He joined the “2007 Biannual Public Art and Mural Symposium held in Manteca, [California]. Eight North American artists were asked to paint 5ft X 8ft murals that depicted the bounty of the Central Valley. These eight murals are now hanging in the Manteca Senior Center at 295 Cherry Lane.”

His mural, “The Harvest Continues,” won first place. It was described as exceptionally detailed as it shows the grapes being prepared for crushing. The crushed product is then made into juice or fermented into wine.

The process of painting started with: “he met with the local grower, John Leandro at his property to research and design his mural. Although Jessie’s dog was not in the original design, Promise insisted on being included, ” based on the association’s website. Promise faithfully stayed by Jessie’s side as he painted through the night that the final mural included the dog, including individual paint lines for the fur,” as described in the website.

When he endeavored to paint adopting a different technique, he shared the dialogue he had in a dream with his spiritual Mentor.

“What would you like to do?”

 “I want to paint again, but I want to paint my way, instead of a brush. I want to show my suffering from my spinal condition.”

“Didn’t you know that guys nailed me to the cross – why not use nails?”

Since then, his paintings have used oil-dipped nails, with clearly defined lines and skin textures.

He painted a mural, Eagle Heart, with soldiers in a group hug, representing five different wars: World War I, World War II, Korean War, Vietnam War, and War against Iraq and Afghanistan.  

This was eventually purchased by the Manteca Mural Society and is still on display, as he predicted to his wife, “My mural will hang there.” Later, he discovered that wall used to be a memorial wall, only it had been painted over. It is simply giving back to the “soul of that wall,” he added.

Manteca Ripon Bulletin reported on April 12, 2011 that “Jessie Marinas – a man who found strength in his “artistic soul” after a series of spinal injuries triggered a number of painful surgeries – is being inducted into the Manteca Hall of Fame.”  

Mariñas has just finished painting Imeldific, a stunning portrait of Imelda Marcos surrounded by diamonds, with her face inside a diamond.

In the artistic world, there is a belief that art is a powerful vehicle for both its surface appeal and its implied underlying nature.

Admittedly, the painter Mariñas succeeded in showing the subject’s beauty, the so-called surface appeal, “but I also sense her sadness, even if surrounded by all of [this] brilliance,” Mariñas added.

In the process of doing Imeldific, Danny Doce became the first student at Jessie Mariñas School of Arts in the Philippines.

Mariñas and Doce met for the first time as part of the “Viajeros” exhibit, which created a mentoring opportunity between Mariñas, the mentor and Doce, the mentee.

Mariñas picked up Doce from the airport, outbound from the Philippines. Doce believes God’s provision allowed him to make this trip to San Francisco. He relied on the prayers of his pastor and fellow church members’ prayers and later was introduced to a sponsor. A few days before the exhibit, the sponsor bought him an airline ticket and inside was $500 as his allowance.

But, Doce had to find lodging.

Mariñas offered lodging for Doce in Manteca, a trek of two hours and 23 minutes by car, 74 miles away. Together they went back to Manteca for rest, and commuted daily, 148 miles round trip, for the installation, opening and take-down of the exhibit. That meant staying till dawn to work on their installations, drive to Manteca and back again to San Francisco.

After, they went to the Golden Gate Bridge, a place of inspiration. There, they sat and drew all day.

In the Philippines, Doce painted with Mariñas. Together they attempted new levels of excellence in portrait painting with three–dimensional effect as if the subjects are coming out of the canvas.

Doce, in an interview on Oct. 14, 2018 via social media, described how a village of generous Filipinos helped him achieve his dream to be in San Francisco.

“Imagine for a month and a week in Manteca, I did not spend a dime, and that is due to the immense generosity of the Mariñas couple. I am grateful for what they did,” he said, adding that even today, Mariñas continues to be his mentor.

“What lesson did you learn,” I asked?

To which he answered, “That I need to focus, that I have to level up, that I am competing not against any other painter, but my former self, and my last painting.”

It is from this rigorous exchange of what can be finessed, what lines can be drawn, what color can be used, that a magnificent painting of Doce came to be, “Nasaan Ka?” It is a portrait of a beautiful woman, almost ephemeral, her facial expressions reaching upward with vibrant red roses surrounding her face, and her face as if coming out of tree branches. Soon after Doce posted it on Facebook, he sold the painting.

Mentoring is described as a relationship between equals, where there is respect and caring between the two. The ancillary effect to their relationship – both have improved from interacting with one another.

After trying to finish the Spoliarium study for a decade, the original was painted by Juan Luna, a Filipino painter in 1884, Mariñas conscientiously studied it at the National Museum of the Philippines and finally, he has just completed it recently. 

Mentoring has its inexplicable rewards, from master mentor to mentee and vice-versa. To whom much is given, much is expected, yet, as one gives, he too gets much in return, as well.

Published on Asian Journal