Select Page
A Joyful Harvest

A Blooming Gift

My children gave the white orchid to me, on the left, for Mother’s Day 2017. It bloomed again this 2018, around Mother’s day. Miracle? Green thumb? Or strong ESP?

The trio of orchid blooms on the right was an anniversary gift from hubby in Jan. 2018. It stays in bloom, five months later.

The White House of self-dealings and illicit affairs vs. truth and integrity

Exercise the power of God as a Christ-certified believer, the power of the Holy Spirit in you.

Anonymous, 2018

 On the eve of Mother’s Day, May 9 (celebrated in Latin America), I took my newly married niece and nephew-in-law to the Rose Garden Tea Room at the Huntington Library in San Marino, California. This has been a bucket list destination for me, that when I asked if they want to have high tea here, I got a yes and a booking. This tearoom is surrounded by many varieties of roses. One in particular presented itself, a bushy flesh, almost ivory rose variety named Marilyn Monroe, with year 2002, next to another tightly-compact, white rose variety named John F. Kennedy, with year 1965.

This is also where David, a waiter, shared his life principle: “Life is a choice. I am presented with having a great day or a mediocre day. I choose my attitude so that even when it is hard, I choose to make it a great day. After all, I am paid to talk and to walk.”

He has distilled his job’s essence such that to provide great service and when customers take delight in your great service, then, perhaps that translates into a bigger tip. Service first, before money.

 It got me thinking about choices, triggered by seeing the roses planted next to each other. Here was John F. Kennedy, a man of power, yet he chose an illicit affair with Marilyn Monroe, even while he was situated in what many Americans consider the highest seat of power, the residence of their elected president. He chose to live outside of his avowed principles of integrity. Had he chosen to remember he has the power of the Holy Spirit in him, perhaps he may not have chosen to have an affair with Marilyn Monroe. But, dead men don’t speak, so we will let that issue rest, and simply use it for illustrative purposes.

 President Bill Clinton was linked with Monica Lewinsky, the student intern who worked in the White House, and who had intimate liaisons with Clinton. She tweeted lately that she had been disinvited, after she agreed to the invitation of lifestyle magazine, Town & Country, to attend its social change summit, only to find out that Pres. Bill Clinton had displaced her and attended.

 Essential Consultants, LLC and the president’s personal lawyer

Fast forward to the current White House resident, Pres. Donald Trump, and we come to find out that his personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, has an illusory firm, Essential Consultants, LLC, for the purpose of “funneling funds” using the words of another president’s lawyer, Rudy Giuliani. Giuliani described it as Michael Cohen “did his job of making this issue go away with Stormy Daniels on October 15, weeks before the 2016 Presidential Election.”

The New Yorker’s Amy Davidson Sorkin on May 9 reported, “As it turns out, companies such as A.T. & T., Novartis, Korea Aerospace Industries, and Columbus Nova—whose largest client is a company controlled by the Russian oligarch Viktor Vekselberg, who is under U.S. sanctions—had made payments to Essential Consultants adding up to more than four million dollars.”

 Oops, $4 million to gain access to the president? The last time I checked, the President’s office is for public purposed-transactions, not for self-dealings, and certainly not to facilitate “favored access” to the federal government’s cache of sanctions and privileges.

 Hence, these corporations that were revealed to have contributed to Essential Consultants were quick to label their payments, one for consulting for advice on healthcare, another for merger advice, another for advice on accounting standards on production costs, even if Michael Cohen had no track record nor expertise on any of these issues.

“There are other possible explanations. One is that the companies were paying Essential Consultants because they thought that Cohen could influence Trump, because Trump respected his advice. This scenario is not without shadiness. Cohen does not appear to be a registered lobbyist; and the documentation that Avenatti obtained indicates that Essential Consultants’ dealings were misrepresented to banks. Another explanation is that the companies were paying Essential Consultants because they thought that, for all intents and purposes, it was Trump,” Sorkin continued.

This exposes Cohen to charges of possible bank fraud, money laundering, in addition to his links to Russian oligarchs’ funneling of monies for possible election malfeasance. Issie Lapowsky of Wired Magazine on April 16, 2018 reported, “When Young Mie Kim (professor of journalism) began studying political ads on Facebook in August of 2016—while Hillary Clinton was still leading the polls— few people had ever heard of the Russian propaganda group, Internet Research Agency. Not even Facebook itself understood how the group was manipulating the platform’s users to influence the election. For Kim, a professor of journalism at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, the goal was to document the way the usual dark money groups target divisive election ads online, the kind that would be more strictly regulated if they appeared on TV. She never knew then she was walking into a crime scene.”

She also found out that most of these ads targeted voters in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Virginia and who sought to divide the American electorate.

Current White House resident Donald Trump’s choice

It would seem that the White House on Pennsylvania Avenue has kept many secrets of its past occupants, only to be revealed after, as truth is known. The illicit affair of Kennedy with Marilyn Monroe, the money-laundering case of selling weapons to Iran by Pres. Reagan, the illicit affair of Clinton with Lewinsky, an intern, and for which Clinton was dragged into an unsuccessful impeachment proceeding by the Republicans. Let us not forget the Watergate break-in of the Democratic headquarters by the burglars traceable to Pres. Nixon and how this president kept tapes surreptitiously of White House guests. Recall when Pres. George W. Bush told the American people that we must go to war against Iraq because of the latter country’s  possession of weapons of mass destruction.

 As to the current White House resident, Trump is presented with a unique choice in his tenure in public office. He can choose to come clean: submit for public scrutiny his federal income taxes, reveal with full transparency what he has done to influence the 2016 presidential election, including his alleged relationships with Stormy Daniels and other women, and to reveal what other illicit choices he has made that will not pass the smell test of public truth and integrity.

 Of course, I might be so naïve as to imagine that, when this is the president who has been reported by the Washington Post to make 3,000+ lies in his 400+ days in office.

How naïve might it be for our readers and myself to think that a powerful man just might do this public confession, considering, the choices of president’s lawyers that he has made: the likes of Giuliani who revealed that the president reimbursed Cohen for the hush money he paid to Daniels, essentially validating that the president was linked to her after all, and of course, Cohen whose house and offices were raided by the FBI?  Would Trump after all remember his presidential oath of office that he was elected to safeguard the U.S. Constitution?

 But, as with anything, I hold out hope that there will be a renaissance from this beleaguered Trump who had to resort to firing James Comey, whom Giuliani described as being fired because he refused to say that the president was not subject to a federal investigation. We now see Vice President Mike Pence eagerly making adulations praising Trump’s leadership to protect the American people, while at the same time, declaring that the special counsel’s investigation of a yearlong has gone on too long without a conclusion.

 Pence is mischaracterizing the special counsel investigation, as a year-long investigation has already led to 23 federal indictments, including a jail term for a Dutch lawyer, Alex van der Zwaan, who was prosecuted, pled guilty and tried and now serving a 30 days-prison sentence in Mueller’s Russia probe.

Will Trump trump truth and integrity, as his final ace card, and remake the wholesale taint of his surname as equal to fraud?  After all he is the only sitting president ordered by a federal court to pay a settlement of $25 million to 4,000 defrauded students, who went to Trump University to learn supposedly “The Trump’s real estate deals.”

 Will he learn from the previous occupant of the White House, Barack Obama, whom television anchors now recall how pure and holy he was, with grace, class, no drama Obama and with elegance? I hold out a special candle on this, as the coherent theme of Trump for the last 15 months in office is to reverse, to rescind and to repeal all the collaborative deals Obama worked on, the latest being the Iran Nuclear deal, lifting sanctions as Iran has shown compliance and verification that no nuclear weapons are being developed to threaten the lives of folks here on earth.

Which will prevail – the dark demons of White House’s past or the light of truth and integrity? President Donald Trump has a choice to lift his name from being synonymous to lies and fraud into its opposite, truth and integrity, after all the first three letters of his name are the first three letters of truth.

Published on Asian Journal

The “red” stories of martyrs’ sacrifice of one’s life so others might live

Over 50 attendees gathered in West Covina, California for the launch of Manuel C. Lahoz’s “Of Tyrants and Martyrs: A Political Memoir.”
Photo by  Prosy Abarquez-Delacruz

Yes, Martial Law is now over. The cruel tyrant had died. But there were other perpetrators during this gruesome era, and many of them are still around today. Now, they use their ill-gotten wealth to attempt to rewrite history and boldly proclaim to the present generation, who were not even born during the dictatorship years, that Martial Law is good for our country. We, who were arrested, tortured, and left to rot in prison, continue to “rebel” against these people who dare to rewrite and revise our history of struggle against the evil tyranny of “One-Man Rule.” Let the “Wall of Remembrance” be our altar where the names of our martyrs and heroes are forever enshrined as a reminder that we who have survived this cruel and dark portion of our history will rise up once again and tell (write) our stories: 1. Stories of defiance and struggle in the face of tyranny, 2. Stories of determination and courage under torture and physical degradation, 3. Stories of indigenous peoples rising up to defend their ancestral lands with their lives and 4. Stories of martyrdom and the sacrifice of one’s life so that others might live. Nunca Mas! These are the stories that uplift the human spirit, because we believe that our brothers and sisters did not die in vain.

Manuel C. Lahoz, “Of Tyrants and Martyrs: A Political Memoir,” published by The University of the Philippines Press, Diliman, Quezon City, 2017.

I have read several books on “One-Man Rule”: Raissa Robles’ “Marcos Martial Law: Never Again”; Susan F. Quimpo and Nathan Gilbert Quimpo’s “Subversive Lives”; Primitivo Mijares’ “Conjugal Dictatorship”; Monina Allaret Mercado’s “People Power: The Philippine Revolution of 1986” and Ninotchka Rosca’s “A State of War,” a captivating novel which I could not put down for three consecutive nights.

 I am reading Manuel C. Lahoz’s “Of Tyrants and Martyrs” and am still rereading chapters, as I believe it is one of the best books on the “One-Man Rule” of Ferdinand Marcos. It explains in layers how life decisions were made, how one gets arbitrarily arrested, even without any apparent crimes or wrongs done.

It presents an insider’s view of what happened to the high school principal, to the deacon, to the band leader, to the nun, to the priest saying the mass then assassinated, to the oppressed farmers and workers, to the indigenous tribespeople who defended their tribal lands from being denuded and defiled by the construction of the Chico Dam.

 Lahoz’s book is to be relished and savored, as if God is near you, as Lahoz’s loving and literary soul is etched in every page of this political memoir. He has eyes that observe every minute detail of each person he met.

 As a reflective person, he is acutely aware and conscious of what his life’s purpose is, writing, “gradually, as in a self-revelation, it dawned on me that there was more to being a priest than just a minister of the sacraments. I had taken the first steps towards the ministry of sevice, which was more than just offering the sacraments to the people, when I made a commitment to be with and be part of the poor and the oppressed in their struggle for justice. I would follow this ministry of service for many years to come.”

One of the best books on “One Man Rule”

Nestor Castro, Vice Chancellor for Community Affairs at UP Diliman, affirms the writings of Lahoz, and also attested to how, he too was imprisoned at Camp Dangwa, Benguet in 1983 and chose to block the details from his memory.

I also found convergence in my assessment, after reading Francisco Lara’s, Ph.D., “Le Politique Du Ventre” mirroring my notes, yet his eloquent words are much more beautiful: “each chapter has a section where simple tasks and the local knowledge of the poor is shared to the reader—such as, how do you repair a section of a destroyed rice terrace (with brains rather than brawn); or cook molasses to sweeten a rice cake (with the right heat and the best rice); or take a dump [referred to in the U.S. as #2] in the forest, with native pigs surrounding you (with sticks and stones), or walk through a hanging bridge without trembling in fear (by looking ahead and not below).”  This is where Lahoz’s sense of humor is vividly on display, particularly in how to take a dump.

 The book is a firsthand account of what happened to the martyrs and even verified by newspaper accounts, Bantayog ng mga Bayani’s account, and other authors. It satisfies the known standard of “believe the assertion, but also verify,” and in one instance, the author even provides three different accounts of what happened to Santiago Arce: laying out the PC Commander’s version of Mr. Arce’s death, the Judge’s Inquest, and the People’s Reaction to the PC Commander’s Version of Arce’s escape.

 The reader equipped with critical thinking skills can discern the details around the Arce’s escape, advanced by the PC Commander, as his use of a gun as improbable and the judge’s inquest more credible and believable – given a simple examination of the gun barrel that was shiny and without bullet residues, confirming that Mr. Arce did not use a gun, as falsely asserted by the military.

It also contains details of Arce’s longest funeral in Abra with twenty priests concelebrating the mass and a funeral procession of about a kilometer long, four abreast, making a long procession of Abrenians walking 0.62 miles.

Why did Arce merit a hero’s funeral? 

Santiago Arce was Little Flower High School’s principal, who was also an ordained church deacon, a bandleader who led the best marching band in Abra, and helped provide seminars to the farmers.

 He describes in vivid details what it is like to have fish caught from the streams and banana blossoms gathered from the forests and then to enjoy eating the charred grilled fish with steaming aromatic rice cooked in bamboo tubes, with cooked banana blossom; half-cooked rice wrapped in woven palm leaves dunked into boiling syrup. He even details the livelihood of folks, and how sugar cane is grown in sandy loam soil, then, harvested and milled into cane juice then molasses, and how lumber is gathered from cut trees, and how at the peak of deforestation – about 50,000 logs await in the river, to be milled and turned into paper. He even describes how a carabao was slaughtered.

 The book‘s details allow us a glimpse into that period where fear predominates first until conviction makes one stand up and others as well, “the members of the FFF (Federation of Free Farmers) attended the funeral procession in big numbers, unafraid of the presence of the military spies.”

It makes us recall the longest procession accorded Lean Alejandro who was reportedly assassinated by Marcos’ military and over 50,000 people lined up the streets to show their sympathy but also their protest to the “One Man Rule.” 

 Lahoz wrote about the assassination of Ama Macli-ing Dulag, who spoke of the land being one with their tribes, “If the land could speak, it would speak for us. It would say like us, the years have forged the bond of life that ties us together. It was our labor that made the land she is. It was her yielding that gave us life. We and the land are one!”

 “Dulag was murdered for speaking out,” Lahoz wrote. “Dulag’s death was planned from the very beginning when he championed the rights of Kalinga and Bontoc peoples against the Chico Dam, a pet project of Marcos with $160 million funding from the World Bank. The proposed Chico Dam was envisioned to provide nearly 2,000 megawatts of hydroelectric power. It would irrigate 65,000 hectares and keep industries and manufacturing companies in Manila running. On the other hand, it would submerge three towns in Mountain Province and five in Kalinga. Nearly 100,000 hectares of ancestral lands, rice fields, farms, forests, hunting grounds, water sources, natural orchards, burial grounds, and pastoral lands would be submerged and lost forever. Some 250,000 Bontocs and Kalingas would be directly relocated.” 

He meticulously footnoted who orally shared and related the stories to him, including itemizing the list of 11 donors, priests and nuns, who contributed P7,000 each for the Grand Bodong in the Cordilleras.

 He wrote about the cultural workers and “the Kalinga women proceeded to approach the bulldozer from the north, the Igorot warriors with their gongs beaten in crescendo, defiantly encircled the engineers like hunters entrapping their prey. With engine roaring, the bulldozer operator continued to do his work approaching the Igorot women coming from the south side. With barely about fifteen meters away, the moving giant machine and the dancing Igorot women were on collision course. The spectators started to cry in alarm. Suddenly, the Igorot women stopped, went down on their knees, ripped their blouses open and bared their breasts, with heads tilted upward to the heavens and arms outstretched as if trying to grab a piece of the sky.“

“They cried as one in a loud voice, ‘Dagami daytoy, pumanawkayo (This is our land, leave us alone)!’ The operator stepped on the brakes and stopped the giant earth-moving machine with barely five meters to spare.” 

Read more on this chapter as “President Marcos decided to unleash the military powers to confront and crush the united opposition of the Bontocs and Kalingas led by their brave and charismatic leader Ama Macli-ing Dulag. The massive use of military in suppressing the population did not go unnoticed by the leaders of the International Monetary Fund (IMF).”

 “It was a silent retreat, but it did not detract from the fact that the Bontocs and Kalingas had accomplished something rare in a third world country, the [World] bank’s withdrawal in the face of popular resistance,“ economist Walden Bello had said.

 With such robust capacity of observation and memory recall, the blood pouring out of the carabao’s jugular vein in his neck, makes for a visual sensory metaphor for how the women and men were arrested, tortured in prison and how women were raped wantonly by a gang of military men, leaving red blood stains all over the place.

 Lahoz describes these incidents of torture with precision and specificity, yet with such respect for the women and the reader as to spare us the gory details of the criminal acts, and leaving us to imagine the atrocity, while describing the details after the gory incident. We came to know the various methods of torture, including the use of flat iron to sear the soles of the prisoners, the grabbing of hair until they are torn off one’s scalp with brute force.

 Many good deeds are equally described, including soldiers who give a hand to the tortured prisoners, or how Abra farmers were supported by construction of irrigation systems funded by the Catholic Lenten Fund of Germany, enabling the farmers to have two croppings a year.

 You could sense the tedious verification that the book went through, as he writes about ordinary people in these chapters and then, through a series of circumstances and the decisions they made, we sense how noble they are, through the words that Manny used in writing this book, not flamboyantly, but precise enough for a person to appreciate how a pregnant woman was helped by movement allies to give birth to her child and even a lesson on how to make spaghetti by her host only to cook it using sardines with canned tomato sauce, and a separate red sauce for Manny.

 It was a gift from her heart to Manny, appreciating how she and her child were sheltered from harm. What is the big deal, as the book asks? Spaghetti is not something you can simply buy at the country store in that period; imagine eating this at a remote village where one has to walk by foot for miles to reach the highway.  So, one is left wondering? How did she make the spaghetti? The woman thought of keeping the spaghetti noodles she got from her host family and kept it with her for months, on the mere chance she would see Manny and thank him for what he did for her. 

Who was Manny Lahoz’s muse? 

Even before coming to the U.S., he had already written half of this book. But when he got to Chicago, he encountered writer’s bloc. It was an imagined conversation with Padre Zacarias Agatep (who was assassinated) that got the words to flow again. The outpourings of events were so fast for his slow hands to capture, that at some point, his handwriting was labored. 

Who was Fr. Agatep? He entered the Immaculate Conception Minor Seminary in Vigan and was ordained a priest in 1965, then was assigned to a small parish of Banayoyo, Ilocos Sur. When he heard a presentation by the Federation of Free Farmers (FFF), Lahoz writes, “he asked the permission of his bishop to become a full-time chaplain and organizer for FFF. Like Paul of Tarsus, who found Christ on the road to Damascus, Zacarias followed Dean Montemayor on the road to Mamatid, Laguna, to study the gospel according to Montemayor.”

 Imagine fulfilling your dream to be an author at 76 years old? He wrote this first book, dedicating it “to Mia, Karl and Angela…that you may learn what really happened during the martial law years.”

 In the United States, he held book launches in Minnesota, Chicago, New York, Oakland, West Covina and Carson.  In one book launch, a disabled young student in a wheelchair remarked, “Can you give us some hope? I am hearing mostly borrowed understanding from my parents.” It piqued with such intensity that I responded, “You are looking for hope – the fact that he survived the trauma and not allow the trauma to sink him into depression is hope. The fact that he is doing book launches at age 76 and caring enough that the true accounts of these martyrs are shared is hope. 

“Also, you can have your primary understanding, not relying on your parents’ borrowed understanding by reading the book fully, by interviewing known martial law survivors and discern for yourself why there is hope in standing up for what is right, why there is hope in standing up for the truth, why there is hope in relying on true accounts, and not the opinionated false claims that it is fake news.”

‘The Man with the Muck-rake’: Common good requires truth and facts

In Bunyan’s ‘Pilgrim Progress’ you may recall the description of the Man with the Muck-rake, the man who could look no way but downward, with the muck-rake in his hand; who was offered a celestial crown for his muck-rake, but who would neither look up nor regard the crown he was offered, but continued to rake to himself the filth of the floor. The Man with the Muckrake is set forth as the example of him whose vision is fixed on the carnal instead of the spiritual things. Yet he also typifies the man who in this life consistently refuses to see aught that is lofty and fixes his eyes with solemn intentness only on that which is vile and debasing. Now, it is very necessary that we should not flinch from seeing what is vile and debasing. There is filth on the floor, and it must be scraped with the muckrake, and there are times and places where this service is the most needed of all the services that can be performed. But the man who never does anything else, who never thinks or speaks or writes save of his feats with the muck-rake, speedily becomes, not a help to society, not an incitement to good, but one of the most potent forces for evil.

Theodore Roosevelt, 1906

That was 1906, and 2018’s muckrake is a Twitter feed from the 45th U.S. president, who has used his account to fire people and to advance his alternate view of reality, prompting sources like CNN, the Washington Post, and BuzzFeed to tally his lies at 5 ½ a day or 2,000+ lies in 400+ days in office.   

CNN’s Chris Cillizza reported on the forced resignation of homeland security adviser Tom Bossert on April 11, the 32nd senior staff to leave since Jan. 20, 2017.

“There are only 65 ‘A-Team’ positions in the White House total. Which means that in the 445 days Trump has been president, he has lost 49 percent of his A Team staff. In Pres. Barack Obama’s first two full years in office, 24 percent of his ‘A Team’ staff departed. For George W. Bush it was 33 percent. Bill Clinton? 38 percent,” Cillizza wrote. 

That turnover had demoralizing effect for staff that remains, but also, the attrition rate is above – average worrisome.

Yet, “Trump tweeted a defense on Wednesday morning. ‘So much Fake News about what is going on in the White House,’ he wrote, adding the mood at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue is ‘Very calm and calculated,’” Cillizza continued.

“No” was the president’s reply

On April 6, 2018, CBS News and CNN broadcasted snippets of Trump responding to questions from the press pool while he was on board Air Force One, one of which was whether he knew about Michael Cohen’s payoff of $130,000 to Stormy Daniels.

Trump said “no,” but his hesitant facial expressions did not support his words. The press pool kept at it and asked why did Cohen make the payment, to which Trump said, “You’ll have to ask Michael Cohen, Michael is my attorney. You’ll have to ask Michael.”

Trump’s “no” essentially erased the “client” in the attorney-client privilege, which arguably one can say that the attorney-client privilege is now abdicated by that “no.” It may be a simplistic way of looking at it, that when a client disavows what his lawyer did, then, it can be argued that the attorney-client privilege was waived.

But what Trump did not think of perhaps was how his “no” laid open for the FBI to search his former lawyer’s premises, with a valid, signed search warrant by a magistrate. No longer protected by an attorney-client privilege, the search warrant can be executed.

Furthermore, Trump tweeted, on April 10, following the search warrant’s being served: “The attorney-client privilege is dead” at 4:07 a.m. Did it die when Trump said “no,” and later declared, “Michael is my attorney, you have to ask him”? Some say Trump’s statements threw his attorney under the bus, since basic to any attorney-client privilege is a constant back and forth consultation and communication between the client and attorney.

Cornell University defines it further as “the privilege is asserted in the face of a legal demand for the communications, such as a discovery request or a demand that the lawyer testify under oath.” In which case, the communications between client and lawyer remain a secret, unless it falls under an exception.

Crime-fraud exception to attorney-client privilege

But is this privilege absolute? Cornell University’s Wex Lax Dictionary defines the exception to this privilege: “The attorney-client privilege protects most communications between clients and their lawyers. But, according to the crime-fraud exception to the privilege, a client’s communication to her attorney isn’t privileged if she made it with the intention of committing or covering up a crime or fraud.”

Why would this exception apply in the Stormy Daniels case, the porn star who allegedly had an affair with Trump in 2006, but a week and a half before the 2016 election, was paid $130,000 in hush money to sign a non-disclosure agreement (NDA)? One signature appears on this NDA, Stormy Daniels, aka Stephanie Clifford, but no signature appears for Trump, the other party and only his lawyer, Michael Cohen.

Even though Trump asserted on Air Force One, “no,” and feigned ignorance of what Michael Cohen did, he and Donald Trump filed a $20 million lawsuit to enforce the NDA and to ensure the silence of Stormy Daniels.

The common good, public facts and truth

Why is Cohen an alleged violator of bank fraud, mail fraud, and campaign finance elections limits? What prompted that raid?

Cohen paid Stormy Daniels $130,000 a week and a half before the election, when the Federal Election Commission (FEC) limits campaign contributions to $5,000 per year per individual. The Washington Post’s Carol D. Leonnig, et. al, on April 9 reported: “Michael Cohen, the longtime attorney of President Trump, is under federal investigation for possible bank fraud, wire fraud and campaign finance violations, according to three people with knowledge of the case.”

Given that scenario, the fraud exception to the attorney-client privilege kicks in, including Trump’s denying knowledge of Cohen’s actions, both are dual factors to invalidating the attorney-client privilege that could have protected the president’s communications with his lawyer.

The Washington Post described what was seized: “Investigators took Cohen’s computer, phone and personal financial records, including tax returns, as part of the search of his office at Rockefeller Center, that person said.”

Was this serving the common good?

Recall the words of Theodore Roosevelt that we must undertake “the relentless exposure of and attack upon every evil man, whether politician or business man, every evil practice, whether in politics, in business or social life. I hail as a benefactor every writer or speaker, every man who, on the platform, or in book, magazine, or newspaper, with merciless severity makes such attack, provided always that he in his turn remembers that the attack is of use only if it is absolutely truthful. The liar is no whit better than the thief, and if his mendacity takes the form of slander, he may be worse than most thieves. An epidemic of indiscriminate assault upon character does no good but very great harm.”

Of late, the line between what is evil and what is good has been blurred by the use of the modern-day muck-rake, “Twitter,” whereupon the lies, repeated many times and liked many times, elevate the popular tweet to now a likely truth. Left unchecked, the lie is held to the same equivalence as truth, a very egregious form of intellectual dishonesty. It does not serve the common good — a principle that benefits the many — when dishonesty prevails.

Trump also characterized the attack on his personal attorney’s office as an attack on our country, prompting Senator Chuck Schumer on April 10 to say: “America has been around for over two and a half centuries, an investigation of your personal attorney is not an attack on our country.” 

He also added, “In this country no man is above the law, not even the president. Mr. President, your comments were the disgrace.”

CNN reported that Cohen stated that the FBI was “professional, courteous and respectful” in the raids, counter to Trump’s depiction in his tweets. Following the Monday raid, the New York Times’ Matt Apuzzo reported Trump saying, “That is really now on a whole new level of unfairness.” 

Was that unfair, as the president claims?

Not really, as there are search and seizure procedures to ensure that the search results are not tainted by improper actions. A “taint team” exists to examine what were seized during the three simultaneous raids, including what constitutes privileged communications between a client and his attorney and might still protected and this segregates the evidence into what is relevant evidence, specifically requested in the search warrant, and anything beyond the scope of the search warrant is returned back to Cohen, and within a specified time period, provided by the court.

But what about the president? Is he not tasked to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States,” which includes defending against these felonies: “counterfeiting federal coins and securities, piracy and felonies committed on the high seas, and treason”? 

Would he not be interested in making sure that if these federal crimes were committed under his watch, then, would he not promote the discovery of evidence and the resulting adjudication of these crimes, using our court systems or arbitration, and not the subsequent $20 million lawsuit to ensure silence against Storm Daniels, to enforce the NDA? 

Robert Reich, the author of “The Common Good,” wrote, “Even before Donald Trump became president, comedian Stephen Colbert joked that the statements of politicians only approximated the truth – ‘truthiness,’ as he called it. The mainstream media, for their part, have occasionally slanted the news out of fear of offending major advertisers or powerful interests in government. New York Times reporter Judith Miller notoriously colluded with the George W. Bush administration in propagating its blatant lie about Saddam Hussein’s supposed weapons of mass destruction. All of this paved the way for Trump – his ubiquitous lies, his ongoing attacks on journalists, and his assault on scientists and researchers. They also served as prelude to ‘fake news,’ some of it coming from foreign sources intent on undermining trust in our democracy.“

I have always maintained that we all, as responsible and informed citizens, are the public guardians of American democracy. As long as we remain ignorant as not read, to discover the facts, from both sides of the political parties, more and more of us will be fed “fake news,” using today’s muck-rake, the tweeter.

On Tuesday, April 10, we watched how Mark Zuckerberg testified before the U.S. Senate while many of the Senators did not even understand the dynamics of Facebook. How may we expect these senators to regulate that which they do not understand to protect our privacy and what is disseminated during election time? To his credit, Zuckerberg admitted his team purged 400 Facebook accounts related to Russian operatives. But he was quick to add there are more that may have escaped their technicians’ scrutiny.

“We must not normalize public lying. The common good requires vigilance against it, and the summoning of public shame when we find it. It is a central obligation of politicians as well as journalists, researchers, scientists and academicians to inform the public of the truth, and to identify lies without fear of retribution. It is the civic responsibility of all of us to check the facts we read or hear, to find and depend upon reliable sources, to share the truth with others, and hold accountable those who lie to us or suppress the truth,” Reich wrote on resurrecting truth in his book, “The Common Good.”

As to Trump’s tweets that the FBI showed favor to Hillary Clinton and is being unfair him, it is hardly the truth. Why? Trump’s appointee, Geoffrey Berman, who contributed to the campaign, and the top federal prosecutor appointed on an interim basis by AG Jeff Sessions, recused himself from this investigation. The warrant was then signed off, as CNN reported, by senior Justice Department officials within Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s office.

Rosenstein is a career public servant for the Justice Department for over 27 years, whose prior records included prosecution of public corruption cases as a trial attorney for the Public Integrity Section of the Criminal Division. Amongst the many programs he was part of included the credit card fraud coordination and international assistance programs, and tax enforcement activities of the Tax Division, the U.S. Attorney’s Office and the Internal Revenue Service. He is a career public servant reputed to be a straight arrow and a stickler for the “rule of law.”

If nothing else, Trump can be assured that the law enforcement officials will “cross their t’s and dot their i’s” to ensure they are doing everything by the “law enforcement book” on policy and procedures, to ensure his rights are protected, as well as Cohen, who some say is really Trump’s fixer.

Published on Asian Journal